[Jul-2025] AD0-E902 Dumps are Available for Instant Access from ExamBoosts [Q13-Q34]

NO.13 A Fusion designer discovers that an iteration is processing thousands of bundles, though it should not need to.
What should the designer do to reduce the number of bundles?

Configure the trigger module to reduce the maximum number of results that Fusion will process during one execution cycle

Configure the trigger module to filter out unnecessary records

Configure the scenario settings to reduce the number of cycles per execution

NO.14 A user needs to find a fields options within a custom form field. The details for the request are shown in the image below:

Which option is applicable for the URL text box?

A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

A screenshot of a web browser Description automatically generated

A screenshot of a web page Description automatically generated

NO.15 What are two required elements of a test case? (Choose two.)

Expected outcome of test

Name of test owner

Clear procedure for completing the test

Source code being tested

NO.16 Which two features or modules can be used to create conditional or nested error handling when using Error Handling Directives? (Choose two.)

Text Parser

Filters

Workfront app

Routers

NO.17 A Fusion user is trying to get a Google Slide presentation to connect to projects in Workfront. Each time the user runs the scenario, this error message appears:

What action should the user take to resolve the error message?

Reauthorize their Google connection

Update Google sharing permissions for the document

Contact Workfront Support to troubleshoot the root cause

Search the Google status site to determine the cause

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Error:
* The error message [403] The caller does not have permission is aGoogle API permission error.
* It typically indicates that the user or application does not have the required access rights to perform the requested action on the Google Slide presentation.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Reauthorize their Google connection:
* This step might be necessary if the user’s credentials or token have expired, but this is not the primary issue here since the error specifically states apermission problem.
* B. Update Google sharing permissions for the document:
* Correct. The error suggests that the Google Slide document has not been shared with the user or service account being used in Fusion. Updating the sharing settings to grant proper permissions (e.g., “Editor” or “Viewer” access) will resolve the issue.
* C. Contact Workfront Support to troubleshoot the root cause:
* While Workfront Support can help with Fusion-related issues, this error originates from Google and is unrelated to Workfront’s systems.
* D. Search the Google status site to determine the cause:
* The Google status site is useful for identifying system-wide outages, but this is a user- specific permission issue, not a Google platform-wide problem.
* Steps to Resolve:
* Open the Google Slide presentation.
* Update the sharing permissions:
* Grant access to the Google account or service account being used in Fusion.
* Ensure the account has at leastEditoror appropriate access rights.
* Save the changes and rerun the Fusion scenario.
* Why Updating Permissions is Best:
* This action directly addresses the root cause of the error, which is inadequate access rights.
* Once permissions are updated, Fusion will be able to connect to and manipulate the Google Slide document as intended.
References:The [403] The caller does not have permission error is documented in Google API troubleshooting guides, which recommend verifying and updating document sharing settings for resolving access issues.

NO.18 To meet compliance standards, a user must include a process that tracks every Workfront project update created by Fusion.
What can they do to address this business requirement?

Use reporting on the Last Updated by ID and Last Update Date

Update the External Reference ID with User ID and Timestamp

Create a Note record related to the record updated

NO.19 A source system provides a list of users and their job roles and departments. The destination system requires the job role values be revised to match the job roles by different department. The end users currently use a spreadsheet to manage that mapping. Updates to this list are infrequent, and management requires more security than the current process offers.
Which method is appropriate for this use case?

Switch

Spreadsheet

Data store

Table aggregator

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Scenario Summary:
* The source system provides a list of users, job roles, and departments.
* The destination system requires a mapping of job roles to different departments.
* Updates to this mapping are infrequent, and there is a concern for more security than a spreadsheet offers.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Switch: A switch function in Workfront Fusion is used to make decisions based on specific conditions but does not maintain persistent data like mappings over time. It is not suitable for storing mappings that require infrequent updates.
* B. Spreadsheet: Spreadsheets may be simple to use but are less secure and not ideal for integrating with Workfront Fusion workflows due to their lack of direct integration features or control over changes.
* C. Data store: Adata storein Workfront Fusion is specifically designed for storing persistent data, such as mappings or reference tables. It is secure, easy to manage, and integrates seamlessly with workflows, making it the best choice for this use case.
* D. Table aggregator: A table aggregator is used for combining or processing data within a workflow but is not suitable for storing persistent mappings outside of a running scenario.
* Why Data Store is Appropriate:
* Persistence: A data store is ideal for maintaining the job role and department mappings across scenarios.
* Security: It is managed within Workfront Fusion, offering better control and access restrictions compared to a spreadsheet.
* Ease of Integration: Data stores can be directly queried or updated in Fusion workflows, allowing seamless handling of mappings.
* Scalability: While updates are infrequent, the data store can handle changes easily and scale if the volume of mappings increases.
* Implementation in Workfront Fusion:
* Create adata storefor job roles and departments in Workfront Fusion.
* Set up fields for Job Role and Department in the data store.
* Use Workfront Fusion scenarios to retrieve and update mappings from this data store based on requirements.
References:This approach aligns with the Workfront Fusion documentation on data stores, which are designed for secure and efficient storage of persistent data used across scenarios. See Workfront Fusion resources for data store setup and use cases for further details.

NO.20 A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?

Select storing of Incomplete Executions in the scenario settings. The customer admin can then filter and search the execution history to resolve errors as they occur.

Use the switch module to catch dates not in the required format and convert the common misused patterns into the appropriate format to prevent the scenario from stopping after three failed executions.

Set up an error handling path that will catch errors in the end user’s inputs and message the users in an email update that they need to try again.

* Understanding the Scenario:
* The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
* The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling “Store incomplete executions” in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
* Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
* Why Option B is Incorrect:
* The “switch module” can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
* Why Option C is Incorrect:
* Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
* Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
* Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* Open theScenario Settingsby clicking the gear icon.
* Enable the optionStore Incomplete Executionsunder Execution settings.
* Save the settings and activate the scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs.
Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
* Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions

NO.21 A Fusion user is developing a scenario. The first half of the scenario needs to be tested for consistency. No additional actions are to be executed.
Which control module is required to disable the execution of subsequent modules?

라우터

Sleep

Ignore

Break

NO.22 A Fusion scenario updates project conditions each night, and should set the project condition to At Risk if there are any high priority open issues on the project. The scenario retrieves all open projects and cycles through the projects. For each project with issues, it retrieves all associated open issues, iterates through them and sets the project condition to At Risk if the issue is high priority or On Target if it is not.
A user notices that Fusion is updating the progress condition multiple times, once for each issue in the project.
How can the developer ensure the project is updated only once?

Change the issue search module to result set of First Matching

Record Add an Ignore error directive as an error handler route for the update module

Create a separate scenario to update the overall project condition

Apply the Run Once flow control function

NO.23 Which two statements about working with incomplete executions are true? (Choose two.)

When incomplete executions are togged, a user must review the History tab to understand the error and then manually run the entire scenario to resolve

Incomplete executions are not stored by default. This option must be enabled in the scenario settings in each scenario

Incomplete executions should be avoided because they only give visibility into better scenario design

When resolving an incomplete execution, the scenario will process the bundle of data through the remainder of the scenario not yet executed

NO.24 A user queried Salesforce for user information, and it returned a name, email address, and user ID. The user would like to assign a task in Workfront.
Which steps are required to assign the task?

Assign the task using the provided user ID > add the user ID to the assignment field

Query Workfront for user based on email address > assign task using returned ID

Query Workfront based on the user’s name > assign task using returned email address

NO.25 Which action makes it possible to see the exact API request and the response a module executes?

Using the Bundle Inspector

Using the execution history

Using the Fusion DevTool scenario debugger

Using the Fusion DevTool error evaluator

NO.26

This scenario shows a 1 in the bundle inspector for the Tasks module and a 23 in the bundle inspector for the Project module.
What does the number in the bundle inspector represent?

The number of seconds to process the module

The number of output bundles

The number of operations performed

The number of times a module has been edited

NO.27

In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?

Aggregator 1’s route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2’s route is set to process all bundles

The source module for the aggregators are different

Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times

The scenario’s router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).
* The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Aggregator 1’s route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2’s route is set to process all bundles:
* Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration.
While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator’s configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.
* B. The source module for the aggregators are different:
* Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from “Projects,” which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from “Issues,” which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.
* C. Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:
* Incorrect. Aggregators do not “repeat” a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.
* D. The scenario’s router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:
* Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., “Projects” to Aggregator 1 and “Issues” to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router’s configuration alone.
* Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:
* Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.
* In this example, “Projects” might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while “Issues” outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).
* How to Verify:
* Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.
* Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.
References:This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion’s handling of bundles and aggregation logic.
Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.

NO.28 A Fusion scenario uses an HTTP module to create a new record.
Which response code indicates that the connection was successful?

GREEN

200

402

500

NO.29 Which action in Fusion enables resource sharing, such as connections, data stores, and keys?

Create a new group

Create a new team

Create a new organization

NO.30 A query returns a partial list of possible values.
Which flow control module should be used to ensure all the possible results are queried?

애그리게이터

Repeater

Iterator

라우터

NO.31 According to Workfront’s training on scenario testing, what are three of the essential elements of a test plan?
(3개 선택)

Roadmap requirements

Description of expected behavior

Specific event/trigger per scenario

Description of testing steps

Executive sponsor expectations

NO.32 In a Fusion scenario, a new project in Workfront will trigger the creation of a new project in ServiceNow. The name of the project in ServiceNow will be constructed in the following format:
Two Digit Year – Reference Number – Project Name
Which expression will generate the correct string?

formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name

join(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name)

concat(formatDate(now;YY) – referenceNumber – name)

NO.33 A Fusion Developer receives frequent notifications that a specific Scenario has been stopped. Upon investigation, the developer notes that there is nothing wrong with the data or process in the scenario, but that the error always occurs on a specific module that calls a third-party system. The error recorded is consistently a service unavailable error, particularly during times of high network traffic to the target system.
Which action should the Fusion Developer take to reduce the number of times the scenario is automatically stopped by Fusion?

Update the Scenario settings to automatically retry failed executions.

Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions.

Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive.

Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater to retry errors.